Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
1.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 25(4): 281-293, 2024 Apr.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526365

ABSTRACT

Cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE) is not only an essential component of cancer rehabilitation, but also a pillar of preventive cardio-oncology. CORE is a comprehensive model based on a multitargeted approach and its efficacy has been widely documented; when compared to an "exercise only" program, comprehensive CORE demonstrates a better outcome. It involves nutritional counseling, psychological support and cardiovascular risk assessment, and it is directed to a very demanding population with a heavy burden of cardiovascular diseases driven by physical inactivity, cancer therapy-induced metabolic derangements and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicities. Despite its usefulness, CORE is still underused in cancer patients and we are still at the dawning of remote models of rehabilitation (telerehabilitation). Not all cardio-oncology rehabilitation is created equal: a careful screening procedure to identify patients who will benefit the most from CORE and a multidisciplinary customized approach are mandatory to achieve a better outcome for cancer survivors throughout their cancer journey.The aim of this position paper is to provide an updated review of CORE not only for cardiologists dealing with this peculiar patient population, but also for oncologists, primary care providers, patients and caregivers. This multidisciplinary team should help cancer patients to maintain a healthy and active life before, during and after cancer treatment, in order to improve quality of life and to fight health inequities.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Cardiologists , Cardiovascular Diseases , Humans , Cardio-Oncology , Quality of Life , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control
2.
Cardiooncology ; 10(1): 18, 2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532515

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T (CAR-T) cell infusion is a rapidly evolving antitumor therapy; however, cardiovascular (CV) complications, likely associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and systemic inflammation, have been reported to occur. The CARdio-Tox study aimed at elucidating incidence and determinants of cardiotoxicity related to CAR-T cell therapy. METHODS: Patients with blood malignancies candidate to CAR-T cells were prospectively evaluated by echocardiography at baseline and 7 and 30 days after infusion. The study endpoints were i) incidence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), CTRCD were also balanced for any grade CRS, but CTRCD occurred of Cardiology Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology (decrements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or global longitudinal strain (GLS) and/or elevations of cardiac biomarkers (high sensitivity troponin I, natriuretic peptides) and ii), correlations of echocardiographic metrics with inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: Incidence of CTRCD was high at 7 days (59,3%), particularly in subjects with CRS. The integrated definition of CTRCD allowed the identification of the majority of cases (50%). Moreover, early LVEF and GLS decrements were inversely correlated with fibrinogen and interleukin-2 receptor levels (p always ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of early CTRCD in patients treated with CAR-T cells, and a link between CTRCD and inflammation can be demonstrated. Dedicated patient monitoring protocols are advised.

3.
Eur Heart J ; 45(14): 1224-1240, 2024 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441940

ABSTRACT

Heart failure (HF) patients have a significantly higher risk of new-onset cancer and cancer-associated mortality, compared to subjects free of HF. While both the prevention and treatment of new-onset HF in patients with cancer have been investigated extensively, less is known about the prevention and treatment of new-onset cancer in patients with HF, and whether and how guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF should be modified when cancer is diagnosed in HF patients. The purpose of this review is to elaborate and discuss the effects of pillar HF pharmacotherapies, as well as digoxin and diuretics on cancer, and to identify areas for further research and novel therapeutic strategies. To this end, in this review, (i) proposed effects and mechanisms of action of guideline-directed HF drugs on cancer derived from pre-clinical data will be described, (ii) the evidence from both observational studies and randomized controlled trials on the effects of guideline-directed medical therapy on cancer incidence and cancer-related outcomes, as synthetized by meta-analyses will be reviewed, and (iii) considerations for future pre-clinical and clinical investigations will be provided.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Neoplasms , Humans , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Neoplasms/epidemiology
5.
Eur Heart J ; 45(6): 419-438, 2024 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238478

ABSTRACT

Ischaemic heart disease represents the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, typically induced by the detrimental effects of risk factors on the cardiovascular system. Although preventive interventions tackling conventional risk factors have helped to reduce the incidence of ischaemic heart disease, it remains a major cause of death worldwide. Thus, attention is now shifting to non-traditional risk factors in the built, natural, and social environments that collectively contribute substantially to the disease burden and perpetuate residual risk. Of importance, these complex factors interact non-linearly and in unpredictable ways to often enhance the detrimental effects attributable to a single or collection of these factors. For this reason, a new paradigm called the 'exposome' has recently been introduced by epidemiologists in order to define the totality of exposure to these new risk factors. The purpose of this review is to outline how these emerging risk factors may interact and contribute to the occurrence of ischaemic heart disease, with a particular attention on the impact of long-term exposure to different environmental pollutants, socioeconomic and psychological factors, along with infectious diseases such as influenza and COVID-19. Moreover, potential mitigation strategies for both individuals and communities will be discussed.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Exposome , Myocardial Ischemia , Humans , Risk Factors , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , Morbidity , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects
6.
Atherosclerosis ; 390: 117393, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Air pollution is emerging as an important risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this study, we investigated the association between short-term air pollution exposure and mechanisms of coronary plaque instability evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging in ACS patients. METHODS: Patients with ACS undergoing OCT imaging were retrospectively selected. Mechanism of culprit lesion instability was classified as plaque rupture (PR) or intact fibrous cap (IFC) by OCT. Based on each case's home address, the mean daily exposures to several pollutants, including particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), on the same day of ACS and in the immediate days (up to 6 days) prior to the index ACS, were collected. RESULTS: 139 ACS patients were included [69 (49.6%) had PR and 70 (50.4%) IFC]. Patients with PR, compared to those with IFC, had higher PM2.5 exposure levels on the same day of ACS, without differences in the immediate 6 days before index ACS. At multivariate analysis, PM2.5 exposure on the same day of ACS was the only independent predictor of PR [OR = 1.912 per SD (8.6 µg/m3), CI95 % (1.087-3.364), p = 0.025]. Patients with PR presented a steady increase in PM2.5 daily exposure levels in the days preceding the occurrence of ACS, with a peak the day of ACS (p for trend = 0.042) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that a higher short-term PM2.5 exposure, on the same day of ACS, is associated with an increased risk of PR as a pathobiological mechanism of coronary plaque instability.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/etiology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Retrospective Studies , Rupture, Spontaneous/complications , Rupture, Spontaneous/pathology , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/complications , Fibrosis , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Coronary Angiography/methods
9.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(22)2023 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38001617

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly recognized comorbidity in patients with cancer. Indeed, cancer patients have a significantly higher incidence of AF than that observed in the general population. A reciprocal relationship between these two diseases has been observed, as much as some assume AF to be a marker for occult cancer screening, especially in older adults. The pathophysiological mechanisms are many and varied, including the underlying pro-inflammatory state, specific treatments (chemo- and radiotherapy), and surgery. The therapeutic management of patients with cancer and AF involves the same rhythm and frequency control strategies as the general population; however, the numerous interactions with chemotherapeutics, which lead to a significant increase in side effects, as well as the extreme fragility of the patient, should be considered. Anticoagulant therapy is also a complex challenge to address, as bleeding and stroke risk scores have not been fully assessed in this subpopulation. Furthermore, in large studies establishing the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), cancer patients have been underrepresented. In this review, we elaborate on the mechanisms linking AF to cancer patients with a particular focus on the therapeutic challenges in this population.

11.
Future Cardiol ; 19(14): 707-718, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37929680

ABSTRACT

Recently, prognosis and survival of cancer patients has improved due to progression and refinement of cancer therapies; however, cardiovascular sequelae in this population augmented and now represent the second cause of death in oncological patients. Initially, the main issue was represented by heart failure and coronary artery disease, but a growing body of evidence has now shed light on the increased arrhythmic risk of this population, atrial fibrillation being the most frequently encountered. Awareness of arrhythmic complications of cancer and its treatments may help oncologists and cardiologists to develop targeted approaches for the management of arrhythmias in this population. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the mechanisms triggering cardiac arrhythmias in cancer patients, their prevalence and management.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Neoplasms , Humans , Prevalence , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Heart Failure/complications
12.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1223660, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37786510

ABSTRACT

In cancer, a patient is considered a survivor from the time of initial diagnosis until the end of life. With improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, the number of cancer survivors (CS) has grown considerably and includes: (1) Patients cured and free from cancer who may be at risk of late-onset cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT); (2) Patients with long-term control of not-curable cancers in whom CTR-CVT may need to be addressed. This paper highlights the importance of the cancer care continuum, of a patient-centered approach and of a prevention-oriented policy. The ultimate goal is a personalized care of CS, achievable only through a multidisciplinary-guided survivorship care plan, one that replaces the fragmented management of current healthcare systems. Collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists is the pillar of a framework in which primary care providers and other specialists must be engaged and in which familial, social and environmental factors are also taken into account.

13.
Cardiooncology ; 9(1): 32, 2023 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37542355

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Baseline cardiovascular risk factors correction is recommended in all cancer patients undergoing potentially cardiotoxic therapies. Despite available guidelines, real-world data on dyslipidemia prevalence and management in the oncologic population are still sparse. METHODS: This survey was an Italian, investigator-initiated survey initially designed and drafted by the Cardio-Oncology section of the Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO), comprising 10 individual multi-choice questions and spread after validation through the ANMCO mailing list. The survey was sent to cardiologists working in cardio-oncology units and/or managing patients with cancer. RESULTS: Our survey included 139 Italian cardiologists. The majority of them routinely ask for the baseline lipidic profile of their patients, regardless of previous clinical history and planned treatment. According to our participants, the estimated prevalence of dyslipidemia in this population is between 20% and 60%. Although this high prevalence, our results highlight that there is poor harmony in terms of scores for CV risk prediction used in clinical practice to guide drug prescription and baseline therapy optimization. On the same line, coronary artery calcium score is poorly used in this setting. At the same time, more than 30% of interrogated physicians do not prescribe adequate statin doses, even though necessary, and have uncertainties on the use of other anti-dyslipidemic drugs in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the necessity of strong evidences on dyslipidemia screening and management in the cancer population, as well as the need of knowledge diffusion from scientific societies to clinicians treating these patients.

15.
Int J Cardiol ; 387: 131110, 2023 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290664

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of patients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has deeply changed thanks to novel pharmacological therapies, such as Sacubitril/Valsartan, which assured morbidity and mortality advantages in this population. These effects may be mediated by both left atrial (LA) and ventricular reverse remodeling, although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery still represents the main parameter of treatment response. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, 66 patients with HFrEF and naïve from Sacubitril/Valsartan were enrolled. All patients were evaluated at baseline, at 3 months and 12 months from therapy initiation. Echocardiographic parameters, including speckle tracking analysis, LA functional and structural metrics, were collected at three timepoints. The endpoints of our study were: (1) to evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on echo measurements; (2) to assess the predictive role of early modifications of these parameters (expressed as ∆ 3-0 months) on long-term LVEF significant recovery, defined as >15% improvement from baseline. RESULTS: The majority of echocardiographic parameters evaluated progressively improved during the observation period, including LVEF, ventricular volumes and LA metrics. ∆(3-0 months) of LV Global Longitudinal Strain (LVGLS) and LA Reservoir Strain (LARS) were associated with significant LVEF improvement at 12 months (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019 respectively). A cut-off of ∆(3-0 months) LVGLS of 3% and of ∆(3-0 months) LARS of 2% could predict LVEF recovery with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: LV and LA strain analysis may identify patients who adequately respond to HFrEF medical treatment and should be routinely used in the evaluation of these patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Humans , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Tetrazoles , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Valsartan , Aminobutyrates , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacology , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations
17.
JAMA Cardiol ; 8(8): 793-794, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378975
18.
Int J Cardiol ; 383: 82-88, 2023 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37164293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is still uncertainty about the management of patients with pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock (PICS). This study aims to investigate the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients with PICS. METHODS: We collected, retrospectively, the data of 18 patients without previously known pheochromocytoma admitted to 8 European hospitals with a diagnosis of PICS. RESULTS: Among the 18 patients with a median age of 50 years (Q1-Q3: 40-61), 50% were men. The main clinical features at presentation were pulmonary congestion (83%) and cyclic fluctuation of hypertension peaks and hypotension (72%). Echocardiography showed a median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25% (Q1-Q3: 15-33.5) with an atypical- Takotsubo (TTS) pattern in 50%. Inotropes/vasopressors were started in all patients and temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) was required in 11 (61%) patients. All patients underwent surgical removal of the pheochromocytoma; 4 patients (22%) were operated on while under t-MCS. The median LVEF was estimated at 55% at discharge. Only one patient required heart transplantation (5.5%), and all patients were alive at a median follow-up of 679 days. CONCLUSIONS: PICS should be suspected in case of a CS with severe cyclic blood pressure fluctuation and rapid hemodynamic deterioration, associated with increased inflammatory markers or in case of TTS progressing to CS, particularly if an atypical TTS echocardiographic pattern is revealed. T-MCS should be considered in the most severe cases. The main challenge is to stabilize the patient, with medical therapy or with t-MCS, since it remains a reversible cause of CS with a low mortality rate.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms , Heart-Assist Devices , Pheochromocytoma , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Stroke Volume , Pheochromocytoma/complications , Pheochromocytoma/diagnosis , Pheochromocytoma/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Ventricular Function, Left , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/complications , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
19.
Future Cardiol ; 19(2): 91-103, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37078438

ABSTRACT

Even if immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy, their use may be complicated by immune-related adverse events. Among these, myocarditis is the most severe complication. The clinical suspicion often arises after clinical symptoms onset and increase in cardiac biomarkers or electrocardiographic manifestations. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are recommended for each patient. However, since they may be misleadingly normal, endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis. Until now, treatment has been based on glucocorticoids even if increasing interest has risen in other immunosuppressive agents. Although myocarditis currently imposes immunotherapy discontinuation, case reports have suggested a safety rechallenge in low-grade myocarditis paving the way for further studies to respond to this unmet clinical need.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Myocarditis , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Myocarditis/chemically induced , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Electrocardiography
20.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1090103, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36895831

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells therapies represent an innovative immunological treatment for patients suffering from advanced and refractory onco-hematological malignancies. The infusion of engineered T-cells, exposing chimeric receptors on the cell surface, leads to an immune response against the tumor cells. However, data from clinical trials and observational studies showed the occurrence of a constellation of adverse events related to CAR-T cells infusion, ranging from mild effects to life-threatening organ-specific complications. In particular, CAR-T cell-related cardiovascular toxicities represent an emerging group of adverse events observed in these patients, correlated with increased morbidity and mortality. Mechanisms involved are still under investigation, although the aberrant inflammatory activation observed in cytokine release syndrome (CRS) seems to play a pivotal role. The most frequently reported cardiac events, observed both in adults and in the pediatric population, are represented by hypotension, arrhythmias and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, sometimes associated with overt heart failure. Therefore, there is an increasing need to understand the pathophysiological basis of cardiotoxicity and risk factors related to its development, in order to identify most vulnerable patients requiring a close cardiological monitoring and long-term follow-up. This review aims at highlighting CAR-T cell-related cardiovascular complications and clarifying the pathogenetic mechanisms coming at play. Moreover, we will shed light on surveillance strategies and cardiotoxicity management protocols, as well as on future research perspectives in this expanding field.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...